Society

Tahir Naqavi: A few “subtle” questions from “Mr. Zarif” about the liberation of Karabakh

Karabakh

1. Those who claim “non-refoulement in war”, “cessation of war” and “negotiation instead of war” by Zarif and Araqchi … why didn’t they use this option in Syria and chose the path of bullets and war against Bashar al-Assad’s opponents ?!

And why didn’t they use the “no war” and “negotiate instead of war” options with ISIS, which committed crimes against the people and citizens of these countries in Iraq and Syria! What is the difference between ISIS claiming territory and power and Armenians occupying Azerbaijani territory ?!

2. Why do they believe in achieving the theory of “war with enemies and terrorists abroad and abroad” when necessary, and officially fight in several countries with the logic of “war should not be dragged into the country”, but call for a ceasefire and talks in Azerbaijan, one-fifth of which is occupied by Armenians? !

3. As we all know and know and admit, the reason for the current Karabakh war is the occupation of a large part of Azerbaijan’s territory by Armenia, and Azerbaijan used force and took up arms to return these lands 30 years later. Now, why did the army, regular and security forces, artillery, tanks and other forces mobilize, conduct regular training and even shoot down several drones because several missiles accidentally landed on Iranian territory?

Why spend so much state money and choose weapons and make regular choices ?!

Why did you move the tanks and cannons? And you did not solve the problem through negotiations ?!

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Back to top button